PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 12.01%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.19%
Cost growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 10.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
48.93%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 15.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.13%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 15.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
45.36%
Total costs growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.82%
D&A growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 10.20%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.55%
EBITDA decline while E4C.DE shows 23.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.23%
EBITDA margin decline while E4C.DE shows 10.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-144.66%
Operating income decline while E4C.DE shows 33.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-133.63%
Operating margin decline while E4C.DE shows 19.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-422.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-227.52%
Pre-tax income decline while E4C.DE shows 32.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-196.01%
Pre-tax margin decline while E4C.DE shows 18.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.99%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 55.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-375.30%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-307.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.