3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.86%
Revenue decline while E4C.DE shows 32.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.71%
Cost growth less than half of E4C.DE's 45.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-8.84%
Gross profit decline while E4C.DE shows 1.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.20%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of E4C.DE's 25.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.83%
Total costs growth less than half of E4C.DE's 39.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-63.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.60%
Other expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 220.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-182.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-253.35%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 83.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-257.87%
Net margin decline while E4C.DE shows 38.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-227.81%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-227.81%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.00%
Share count reduction below 50% of E4C.DE's 7.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
20.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of E4C.DE's 8.44%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.