PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.21%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 9.83%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
82.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 18.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-55.14%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.11%
Operating expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 1.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.23%
Total costs growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 11.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.11%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
80.12%
EBITDA growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.37%
EBITDA margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.40%
Operating income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.30%
Operating margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-705.26%
Other expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 36.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.97%
Pre-tax income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
19.91%
Net income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.44%
Net margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
EPS growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
Diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Share count increase while E4C.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.20%
Diluted share increase while E4C.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.