PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.77%
Revenue decline while E4C.DE shows 0.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.90%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-22.70%
Gross profit decline while E4C.DE shows 4.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.83%
Margin decline while E4C.DE shows 4.27% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.51%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.08%
Operating expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 3.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.12%
Interest expense growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.79%
D&A growth while E4C.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.79%
EBITDA decline while E4C.DE shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.08%
EBITDA margin decline while E4C.DE shows 7.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.79%
Operating income decline while E4C.DE shows 106.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.73%
Operating margin decline while E4C.DE shows 104.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.57%
Other expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 54.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.98%
Pre-tax income decline while E4C.DE shows 264.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while E4C.DE shows 262.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.67%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 518.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-62.10%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 81.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.20%
Net margin decline while E4C.DE shows 81.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.07%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 81.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.07%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 81.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.