PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.70%
Revenue decline while E4C.DE shows 10.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.95%
Cost reduction while E4C.DE shows 11.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-25.63%
Gross profit decline while E4C.DE shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.63%
Other expenses growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.28%
Total costs reduction while E4C.DE shows 7.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
25.26%
Interest expense growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.72%
EBITDA decline while E4C.DE shows 25.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.26%
EBITDA margin decline while E4C.DE shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.96%
Operating income decline while E4C.DE shows 84.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.29%
Operating margin decline while E4C.DE shows 67.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
31.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of E4C.DE's 116.79%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-36.97%
Pre-tax income decline while E4C.DE shows 98.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while E4C.DE shows 80.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.41%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 99.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-51.77%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 348.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.99%
Net margin decline while E4C.DE shows 306.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.81%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 340.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.81%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 340.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.