PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.34%
Positive growth while E4C.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.64%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
19.13%
Positive growth while E4C.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.40%
Margin expansion 50-75% of E4C.DE's 22.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
71.44%
Operating expenses growth less than half of E4C.DE's 230.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.72%
Total costs growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
123.26%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 89.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
13.14%
D&A growth while E4C.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.09%
EBITDA growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.41%
EBITDA margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-43.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-222.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-51.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.21%
Tax expense growth while E4C.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.78%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.