PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.43%
Revenue decline while E4C.DE shows 5.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.54%
Cost reduction while E4C.DE shows 7.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.94%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.61%
Margin expansion while E4C.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
193.30%
Other expenses growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.14%
Operating expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 0.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.34%
Total costs reduction while E4C.DE shows 5.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.97%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.47%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.83%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.23%
EBITDA margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.36%
Operating income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.86%
Operating margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-78.05%
Other expenses reduction while E4C.DE shows 336.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
80.61%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 1.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
124.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-27.38%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 97.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
279.01%
Net income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
370.43%
Net margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
282.78%
EPS growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
282.78%
Diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.