PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x LSX.DE's 5.11%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
23.52%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 10.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
18.42%
Positive growth while LSX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.55%
Similar operating expenses growth to LSX.DE's 31.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
24.02%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 12.61%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-23.06%
Interest expense reduction while LSX.DE shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.76%
Similar D&A growth to LSX.DE's 4.81%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
3.64%
EBITDA growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.38%
Operating income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-146.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.30%
Pre-tax income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.88%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of LSX.DE's 15.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
15.82%
Net income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.67%
EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.