PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.10%
Positive growth while LSX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-36.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
236.90%
Positive growth while LSX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
200.54%
Margin expansion while LSX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8604.79%
Other expenses growth while LSX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
420.82%
Similar operating expenses growth to LSX.DE's 489.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.86%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 4.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.16%
Interest expense growth while LSX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.17%
D&A growth less than half of LSX.DE's 8.55%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
24.43%
EBITDA growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.00%
EBITDA margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.38%
Operating income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.67%
Operating margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of LSX.DE's 228.87%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
44.18%
Pre-tax income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.08%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSX.DE's 17000.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.31%
Net income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.60%
Net margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.