PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.21%
Positive growth while M7U.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
82.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x M7U.DE's 1.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-55.14%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.11%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.23%
Total costs growth while M7U.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.15%
D&A growth 50-75% of M7U.DE's 267.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
80.12%
EBITDA growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.37%
EBITDA margin growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.40%
Operating income growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.30%
Operating margin growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-705.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.97%
Pre-tax income growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.40%
Tax expense reduction while M7U.DE shows 5.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
19.91%
Net income growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.44%
Net margin growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
EPS growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.42%
Diluted EPS growth while M7U.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Share count increase while M7U.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.20%
Diluted share increase while M7U.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.