PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.77%
Revenue decline while M7U.DE shows 21.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.90%
Cost reduction while M7U.DE shows 30.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.51%
Other expenses growth while M7U.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.08%
Operating expenses reduction while M7U.DE shows 5.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.57%
Total costs reduction while M7U.DE shows 27.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.12%
Interest expense change of 18.12% while M7U.DE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
25.79%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x M7U.DE's 22.84%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-25.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-74.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.67%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-62.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.07%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.07%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.