PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
46.67%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
45.52%
Cost increase while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
48.07%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.95%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.56%
Operating expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.02%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.25%
D&A growth while MZX.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
281.67%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1383.88%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
975.33%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-104.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
326.02%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
254.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3436.88%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
202.37%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
169.80%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
211.76%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
211.76%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.33%
Share count reduction while MZX.DE shows 28.47% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.33%
Diluted share reduction while MZX.DE shows 28.47% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.