PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.64%
Cost increase while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-10.59%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.39%
Margin decline while MZX.DE shows 3.50% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.63%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.75%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.54%
D&A reduction while MZX.DE shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-20.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.47%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.27%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-290.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.73%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-51.82%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
82.80%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.38%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.29%
EPS growth below 50% of MZX.DE's 260.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MZX.DE's 260.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.26%
Share count increase while MZX.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.00%
Diluted share increase while MZX.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.