PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.02%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.95%
Cost growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.57%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.36%
Operating expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.59%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.35%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
342.90%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
305.80%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.12%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
228.04%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.36%
Other expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.99%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.92%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.20%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.37%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.38%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.82%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MZX.DE's 18.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
7.82%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MZX.DE's 18.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.