PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.63%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-16.36%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.06%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.46%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MZX.DE's 4.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.28%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.58%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.15%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.30%
D&A reduction while MZX.DE shows 6.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-50.38%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
89.96%
Other expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-39.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.99%
Tax expense reduction while MZX.DE shows 27.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.50%
EPS decline while MZX.DE shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.50%
Diluted EPS decline while MZX.DE shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.75%
Share count increase while MZX.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.75%
Diluted share increase while MZX.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.