PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.13%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.32%
Cost growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
23.71%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.98%
Margin expansion while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.54%
Other expenses reduction while MZX.DE shows 13.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.64%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MZX.DE's 13.50%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 9.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.58%
Interest expense growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.51%
Similar D&A growth to MZX.DE's 10.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
36.94%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.99%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.43%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.40%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 6.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
50.05%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.70%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
51.76%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.33%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.