PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.12
1.0–1.2 – Bare minimum. Philip Fisher would question if expansions or unforeseen costs could trigger liquidity stress.
0.71
Below 1.0 – Possible short-term liquidity stress. Howard Marks would caution about heavy reliance on selling inventory or raising cash quickly.
0.17
Below 0.4 – Weak immediate liquidity. Howard Marks would worry about meeting obligations if markets tighten.
7.37
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
0.14
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.