33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-1.97%
Cash & equivalents declining -1.97% while ZS's grows 13.19%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
18.87%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of ZS's -2.82%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
13.18%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ZS's 6.36%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
20.17%
Similar receivables growth to ZS's 21.14%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
26.59%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to ZS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
253.73%
Above 1.5x ZS's 3.58%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
27.42%
≥ 1.5x ZS's 8.00%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-2.31%
Below half ZS's 2.62%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.02%
Both ZS and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.20%
Less than half of ZS's 4.59%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-15.75%
Below half of ZS's 1.94%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.38%
0.5-0.75x ZS's 6.31%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
14.84%
Less than half of ZS's -3.03%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-3.03%
Less than half of ZS's 2213.53%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.70%
≥ 1.5x ZS's 4.09%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-0.80%
Less than half of ZS's -89.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
7.63%
Above 1.5x ZS's 2.88%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.96%
Both ZS and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to ZS's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.44%
Less than half of ZS's -70.55%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.35%
1.1-1.25x ZS's 3.60%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.28%
≥ 1.5x ZS's -0.67%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
5434.48%
Less than half of ZS's -397.08%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.42%
Below half ZS's 12.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
4.38%
0.5-0.75x ZS's 6.31%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
2.76%
Below half ZS's -2.82%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-6.33%
Less than half of ZS's 0.08%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-3.97%
Less than half of ZS's -64.45%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
