33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.79%
Some net income increase while BRZE is negative at -23.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
45.85%
Less D&A growth vs. BRZE's 676.74%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.38%
SBC growth while BRZE is negative at -5.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Slight usage while BRZE is negative at -30.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
91.58%
AR growth while BRZE is negative at -293.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
82.48%
Inventory growth of 82.48% while BRZE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-253.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with BRZE at -1178.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while BRZE is 175.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-41.29%
Both negative yoy, with BRZE at -348.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
98.78%
Some CFO growth while BRZE is negative at -198.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
4.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BRZE's 73.28%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while BRZE stands at 54.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
6.70%
We have some liquidation growth while BRZE is negative at -54.16%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BRZE's 51.28%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
11.61%
Debt repayment growth of 11.61% while BRZE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with BRZE at -168.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.