PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.07%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CFLT's 17.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-1.70%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CFLT at -2.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
SBC growth while CFLT is negative at -0.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-229.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CFLT at -77.55%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
79.06%
AR growth well above CFLT's 62.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-150.17%
Negative yoy inventory while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
54.60%
A yoy AP increase while CFLT is negative at -89.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-178.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CFLT at -102.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
210.38%
Some yoy increase while CFLT is negative at -95.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
54.00%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of CFLT's 81.76%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-11.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while CFLT is 89.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. CFLT's 39.94%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
0.43%
We have some liquidation growth while CFLT is negative at -10.08%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3906.00%
Growth well above CFLT's 87.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
91.39%
Investing outflow well above CFLT's 52.87%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.28%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-97.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with CFLT at -429.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.