PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Net income growth of 50.35% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-2.57%
Negative yoy D&A while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while CFLT is negative at -37791.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.05%
Negative yoy SBC while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
375.12%
Working capital change of 375.12% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
131.57%
AR growth of 131.57% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-270.03%
Negative yoy inventory while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-136.06%
Negative yoy AP while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.04%
Growth of 14.04% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-21.34%
Both negative yoy, with CFLT at -216.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
156.52%
Some CFO growth while CFLT is negative at -175.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-141.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with CFLT at -113.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while CFLT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
28.54%
Purchases growth of 28.54% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.15%
We reduce yoy sales while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
120.01%
We have some outflow growth while CFLT is negative at -144.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
107.15%
We have mild expansions while CFLT is negative at -1192.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
37.14%
Debt repayment growth of 37.14% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-91.73%
Negative yoy issuance while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.