PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.24%
Negative net income growth while EXFY stands at 66.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.37%
Some D&A expansion while EXFY is negative at -20.34%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EXFY stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-61.84%
Negative yoy SBC while EXFY is 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
17.00%
Less working capital growth vs. EXFY's 111.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-65.52%
AR is negative yoy while EXFY is 77.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-110.27%
Negative yoy inventory while EXFY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
24.60%
A yoy AP increase while EXFY is negative at -232.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
40.65%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EXFY's 131.21%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
401.33%
Well above EXFY's 82.05%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-10.58%
Negative yoy CFO while EXFY is 138.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-27.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXFY at -9.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above EXFY's 3.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-23.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXFY at -9.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
56.55%
We repay more while EXFY is negative at -49.78%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.00%
Buyback growth of 98.00% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.