PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Negative net income growth while EXFY stands at 40.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
803.92%
D&A growth well above EXFY's 18.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
Less SBC growth vs. EXFY's 31.09%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
42.97%
Slight usage while EXFY is negative at -903.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1607.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with EXFY at -121.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.17%
Inventory growth of 191.17% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
431.47%
A yoy AP increase while EXFY is negative at -1076.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
354.20%
Some yoy usage while EXFY is negative at -729.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
4830.17%
Well above EXFY's 106.19%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while EXFY is 100.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
Some CapEx rise while EXFY is negative at -119.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
2230.85%
Acquisition growth of 2230.85% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.11%
We reduce yoy sales while EXFY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-2230.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while EXFY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2836.98%
We reduce yoy invests while EXFY stands at 49.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EXFY is 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
Stock issuance far above EXFY's 32.92%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.