PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Some net income increase while EXFY is negative at -141.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.57%
Negative yoy D&A while EXFY is 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Well above EXFY's 40.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.05%
Both cut yoy SBC, with EXFY at -20.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
375.12%
Well above EXFY's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
131.57%
AR growth well above EXFY's 137.59%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-270.03%
Negative yoy inventory while EXFY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-136.06%
Negative yoy AP while EXFY is 144.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.04%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EXFY's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-21.34%
Both negative yoy, with EXFY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
156.52%
Some CFO growth while EXFY is negative at -35.09%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-141.62%
Negative yoy CapEx while EXFY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
28.54%
Purchases growth of 28.54% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.15%
We reduce yoy sales while EXFY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
120.01%
Growth of 120.01% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
107.15%
Investing outflow well above EXFY's 46.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
37.14%
We repay more while EXFY is negative at -3.03%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-91.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXFY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.