PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.79%
Some net income increase while EXFY is negative at -177.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
45.85%
D&A growth well above EXFY's 3.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.38%
SBC growth while EXFY is negative at -13.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Less working capital growth vs. EXFY's 463.45%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
91.58%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. EXFY's 200.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
82.48%
Inventory growth of 82.48% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-253.69%
Negative yoy AP while EXFY is 204.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while EXFY is 368.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-41.29%
Negative yoy while EXFY is 19.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
98.78%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 85.56%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
4.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. EXFY's 96.59%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
6.70%
Liquidation growth of 6.70% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
We have mild expansions while EXFY is negative at -135.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.61%
Debt repayment growth of 11.61% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while EXFY is 29.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.