PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.91%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 6.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
26.47%
Some D&A expansion while FLNC is negative at -0.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.70%
SBC growth while FLNC is negative at -22.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
82.05%
Less working capital growth vs. FLNC's 174.40%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-332.36%
AR is negative yoy while FLNC is 200.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-285.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FLNC at -23.73%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
203.09%
A yoy AP increase while FLNC is negative at -116.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-4827.66%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FLNC at -71.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-40.65%
Both negative yoy, with FLNC at -307.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
65.15%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FLNC's 103.92%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-64.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -673.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5738.47%
We reduce yoy invests while FLNC stands at 48.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-101.60%
Negative yoy issuance while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.