PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 26.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-85.57%
Negative yoy D&A while FLNC is 37.99%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.75%
SBC growth while FLNC is negative at -27.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-134.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FLNC is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-327.10%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FLNC at -97.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-22.51%
Negative yoy inventory while FLNC is 58.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
179.54%
AP growth well above FLNC's 139.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
117.34%
Some yoy usage while FLNC is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-103.89%
Both negative yoy, with FLNC at -5963.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-23.46%
Negative yoy CFO while FLNC is 78.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.38%
Some CapEx rise while FLNC is negative at -106.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while FLNC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
4.07%
Liquidation growth of 4.07% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-101.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -4.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1289.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -46.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
9.68%
We repay more while FLNC is negative at -200.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1894.43%
Issuance growth of 1894.43% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.