PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.79%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 116.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
45.85%
D&A growth well above FLNC's 33.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.38%
Less SBC growth vs. FLNC's 66.41%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
100.00%
Well above FLNC's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
91.58%
AR growth while FLNC is negative at -95.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
82.48%
Inventory growth well above FLNC's 133.37%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-253.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with FLNC at -83.16%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while FLNC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-41.29%
Both negative yoy, with FLNC at -10988.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
98.78%
Some CFO growth while FLNC is negative at -233.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
4.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FLNC's 18.17%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while FLNC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
6.70%
Liquidation growth of 6.70% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Investing outflow well above FLNC's 3.79%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.61%
Debt repayment well below FLNC's 99.88%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.