PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-97.47%
Negative net income growth while FLNC stands at 116.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.04%
Less D&A growth vs. FLNC's 33.38%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.68%
Less SBC growth vs. FLNC's 66.41%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-36.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FLNC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
130.38%
AR growth while FLNC is negative at -95.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
149.84%
Inventory growth well above FLNC's 133.37%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-161.16%
Both negative yoy AP, with FLNC at -83.16%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
5685.63%
Growth well above FLNC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
46.02%
Some yoy increase while FLNC is negative at -10988.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.32%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FLNC at -233.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while FLNC is 18.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while FLNC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.34%
Liquidation growth of 25.34% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3894.40%
We reduce yoy invests while FLNC stands at 3.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7.69%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 99.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.