PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.24%
Negative net income growth while GTLB stands at 76.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.37%
Some D&A expansion while GTLB is negative at -1.18%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GTLB stands at 109.53%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-61.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GTLB at -96.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
17.00%
Slight usage while GTLB is negative at -140.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-65.52%
AR is negative yoy while GTLB is 7.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-110.27%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GTLB at -246.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
24.60%
A yoy AP increase while GTLB is negative at -123.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
40.65%
Some yoy usage while GTLB is negative at -230.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
401.33%
Well above GTLB's 8.03%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-10.58%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GTLB at -192.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-27.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while GTLB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-23.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
56.55%
Debt repayment growth of 56.55% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.00%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x GTLB's 28.05%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.