PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.38%
Some net income increase while GTLB is negative at -44.14%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.65%
D&A growth well above GTLB's 1.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.57%
Negative yoy SBC while GTLB is 52.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-321.58%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GTLB is 127.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
29.43%
AR growth while GTLB is negative at -374.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-4339.78%
Negative yoy inventory while GTLB is 281.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
17.49%
A yoy AP increase while GTLB is negative at -237.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-199.24%
Negative yoy usage while GTLB is 245.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
48.95%
Well above GTLB's 23.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-20.97%
Negative yoy CFO while GTLB is 20.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.29%
CapEx growth of 21.29% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.55%
We expand invests by 7.55% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-46.58%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to GTLB's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.