PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.47%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GTLB's 16.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
2.18%
Less D&A growth vs. GTLB's 8.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.41%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GTLB at -0.20%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
182.83%
Slight usage while GTLB is negative at -322.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-128.79%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GTLB at -272.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
172.16%
Inventory growth of 172.16% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-17.75%
Both negative yoy AP, with GTLB at -227.86%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
193.56%
Growth well above GTLB's 28.38%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-367.84%
Negative yoy while GTLB is 32.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
66.07%
Some CFO growth while GTLB is negative at -879.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
41.76%
CapEx growth well above GTLB's 41.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.27%
Some yoy expansion while GTLB is negative at -70.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19940.51%
We have some outflow growth while GTLB is negative at -137.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
31.81%
We have mild expansions while GTLB is negative at -102.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-21.14%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.