PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x GTLB's 3.20%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.46%
Some D&A expansion while GTLB is negative at -0.66%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.67%
Less SBC growth vs. GTLB's 43.42%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-76.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GTLB is 973.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-167.50%
AR is negative yoy while GTLB is 322.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
30.20%
Inventory growth of 30.20% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
138.33%
AP growth well above GTLB's 152.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-9.65%
Negative yoy usage while GTLB is 117.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
61.85%
Well above GTLB's 23.86%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-26.15%
Negative yoy CFO while GTLB is 347.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -8.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Some yoy expansion while GTLB is negative at -369.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-5.06%
We reduce yoy sales while GTLB is 126.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.90%
We have mild expansions while GTLB is negative at -466.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.