PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Negative net income growth while GTLB stands at 87.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
803.92%
Some D&A expansion while GTLB is negative at -5.11%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
SBC growth well above GTLB's 4.07%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
42.97%
Slight usage while GTLB is negative at -102.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1607.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GTLB at -1.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.17%
Some inventory rise while GTLB is negative at -199.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
431.47%
A yoy AP increase while GTLB is negative at -502.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
354.20%
Growth well above GTLB's 509.65%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4830.17%
Well above GTLB's 663.76%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while GTLB is 516.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
CapEx growth well above GTLB's 55.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
2230.85%
Acquisition spending well above GTLB's 83.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-19.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -1.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-6.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GTLB at -18.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-2230.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -102.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2836.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -345.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
Stock issuance far above GTLB's 217.96%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.