PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.79%
Net income growth under 50% of GTLB's 111.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
45.85%
Some D&A expansion while GTLB is negative at -141.63%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.38%
SBC growth while GTLB is negative at -1.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Well above GTLB's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
91.58%
AR growth while GTLB is negative at -10.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
82.48%
Inventory growth of 82.48% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-253.69%
Both negative yoy AP, with GTLB at -9507.14%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while GTLB is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-41.29%
Both negative yoy, with GTLB at -2075.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
98.78%
Some CFO growth while GTLB is negative at -1613.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
4.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. GTLB's 87.05%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -102.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
6.70%
Below 50% of GTLB's 22.53%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
We have mild expansions while GTLB is negative at -1697.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.61%
Debt repayment growth of 11.61% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.