PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.24%
Negative net income growth while MDB stands at 15.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.37%
Some D&A expansion while MDB is negative at -20.88%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-61.84%
Negative yoy SBC while MDB is 23.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
17.00%
Less working capital growth vs. MDB's 397.15%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-65.52%
AR is negative yoy while MDB is 180.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-110.27%
Negative yoy inventory while MDB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
24.60%
A yoy AP increase while MDB is negative at -52.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
40.65%
Some yoy usage while MDB is negative at -151.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
401.33%
Some yoy increase while MDB is negative at -76.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-10.58%
Negative yoy CFO while MDB is 154.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-27.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MDB is 24.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while MDB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-23.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with MDB at -135.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
56.55%
We repay more while MDB is negative at -2333.90%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.00%
Buyback growth of 98.00% while MDB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.