33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with S at -2.39%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
803.92%
D&A growth well above S's 4.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
SBC growth while S is negative at -2.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
42.97%
Well above S's 44.34% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1607.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with S at -789.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.17%
Some inventory rise while S is negative at -5795.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
431.47%
A yoy AP increase while S is negative at -822.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
354.20%
Growth well above S's 566.64%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4830.17%
Well above S's 1226.28%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while S is 72.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
CapEx growth well above S's 38.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
2230.85%
Some acquisitions while S is negative at -301.41%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-19.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while S stands at 96.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.11%
We reduce yoy sales while S is 1.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-2230.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while S is 1979.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2836.98%
We reduce yoy invests while S stands at 779.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while S is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
Stock issuance far above S's 572.59%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.