PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Net income growth above 1.5x S's 1.31%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-85.57%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with S at -2.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.75%
SBC growth well above S's 10.46%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-134.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with S at -158.40%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-327.10%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with S at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-22.51%
Negative yoy inventory while S is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
179.54%
A yoy AP increase while S is negative at -199.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
117.34%
Growth well above S's 73.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-103.89%
Negative yoy while S is 21.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-23.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with S at -94.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.38%
Lower CapEx growth vs. S's 93.35%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while S stands at 20.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
4.07%
We have some liquidation growth while S is negative at -7.82%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-101.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while S is 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1289.41%
We reduce yoy invests while S stands at 91.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
9.68%
Debt repayment growth of 9.68% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1894.43%
Stock issuance far above S's 129.45%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.