PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
71.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x TOST's 18.18%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
8.71%
D&A growth of 8.71% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TOST stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-80.59%
Both cut yoy SBC, with TOST at -11.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-13.93%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TOST at -94.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
79.50%
AR growth while TOST is negative at -300.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
17.04%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TOST's 93.33%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-129.69%
Negative yoy AP while TOST is 500.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
87.52%
Some yoy usage while TOST is negative at -240.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
679.61%
Some yoy increase while TOST is negative at -35.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TOST at -189.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-13.49%
Negative yoy CapEx while TOST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above TOST's 94.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-12.29%
We reduce yoy invests while TOST stands at 42.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-15.31%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TOST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-99.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with TOST at -26.67%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.