33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TOST at -42.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
803.92%
Some D&A expansion while TOST is negative at -8.33%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
SBC growth of 8.19% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
42.97%
Less working capital growth vs. TOST's 100.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1607.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TOST at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.17%
Some inventory rise while TOST is negative at -400.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
431.47%
AP growth well above TOST's 300.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
354.20%
Growth well above TOST's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4830.17%
Well above TOST's 93.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while TOST is 34.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
Some CapEx rise while TOST is negative at -8.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
2230.85%
Acquisition growth of 2230.85% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with TOST at -57.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-6.11%
We reduce yoy sales while TOST is 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-2230.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while TOST is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2836.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with TOST at -266.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TOST is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
We slightly raise equity while TOST is negative at -48.28%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.