PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Net income growth at 50-75% of TOST's 75.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.57%
Negative yoy D&A while TOST is 72.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.05%
Negative yoy SBC while TOST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
375.12%
Working capital change of 375.12% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
131.57%
AR growth well above TOST's 50.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-270.03%
Negative yoy inventory while TOST is 158.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-136.06%
Negative yoy AP while TOST is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.04%
Growth of 14.04% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-21.34%
Both negative yoy, with TOST at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
156.52%
Some CFO growth while TOST is negative at -46.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-141.62%
Negative yoy CapEx while TOST is 23.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TOST stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
28.54%
Purchases well above TOST's 8.33%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-5.15%
We reduce yoy sales while TOST is 20.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
120.01%
Growth of 120.01% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
107.15%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. TOST's 246.67%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
37.14%
Debt repayment growth of 37.14% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-91.73%
Negative yoy issuance while TOST is 73.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.