33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -2.26%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-2.57%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.05%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
375.12%
A slight increase while Technology median is negative at -24.61%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
131.57%
AR growth of 131.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-270.03%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-136.06%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
14.04%
Some yoy usage while Technology median is negative at -61.70%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
-21.34%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -62.49%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
156.52%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -14.34%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-141.62%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
28.54%
Purchases growth of 28.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-5.15%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
120.01%
Growth of 120.01% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
107.15%
Investing flow of 107.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
37.14%
Debt repayment growth of 37.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-91.73%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.