33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.48%
Revenue growth above 1.5x EXFY's 2.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.10%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 5.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-679.76%
Negative EBIT growth while EXFY is at 87.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-679.76%
Negative operating income growth while EXFY is at 87.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-679.04%
Negative net income growth while EXFY stands at 58.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-600.00%
Negative EPS growth while EXFY is at 58.40%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-600.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXFY is at 58.40%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
12.45%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.77%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.77%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.07%
Negative OCF growth while EXFY is at 815.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-28.39%
Negative FCF growth while EXFY is at 471.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
38.90%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
38.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-20.85%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-20.85%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-20.85%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-485.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-485.96%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-485.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
255.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 220.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
255.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 220.23%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
255.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 220.23%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.98%
AR growth well above EXFY's 1.07%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
48.23%
Inventory growth well above EXFY's 54.88%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
86.77%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
239.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x EXFY's 0.71%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.72%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
325.97%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
155.50%
We expand SG&A while EXFY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.