PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.43%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.36%
Positive gross profit growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
72.53%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
72.53%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
71.92%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.62%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
84.62%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
82.78%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.25%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
82.78%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Negative OCF growth while EXFY is at 14.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.02%
Negative FCF growth while EXFY is at 15.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-25.39%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-25.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-25.39%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
39.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of EXFY's 152.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
39.61%
Below 50% of EXFY's 152.75%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
39.61%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of EXFY's 152.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
15.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
15.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
15.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
6.09%
Below 50% of EXFY's 1348.83%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
6.09%
Below 50% of EXFY's 1348.83%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.09%
Below 50% of EXFY's 1348.83%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.50%
Our AR growth while EXFY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
26.99%
We show growth while EXFY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.46%
Negative asset growth while EXFY invests at 3.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-46.76%
We have a declining book value while EXFY shows 5.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-67.59%
Our R&D shrinks while EXFY invests at 81.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-38.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.