33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.60%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.15%
Positive gross profit growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.51%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.51%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.91%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.38%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.38%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.94%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.56%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.56%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.15%
Positive OCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
46.36%
Positive FCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-28.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.72%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-28.72%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
85.08%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
85.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
85.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
13.77%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXFY's 17.53%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
13.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXFY's 17.53%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
13.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of EXFY's 17.53%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
171.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 171.36% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
171.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 171.36% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
171.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 171.36% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.31%
Our AR growth while EXFY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.94%
Inventory growth well above EXFY's 2.04%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.37%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.32%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-83.76%
We’re deleveraging while EXFY stands at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
19.41%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. EXFY's 29.70%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.14%
SG&A growth well above EXFY's 2.57%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.