PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.51%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.67%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 5.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-26.39%
Negative EBIT growth while EXFY is at 70.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.39%
Negative operating income growth while EXFY is at 70.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-26.60%
Negative net income growth while EXFY stands at 49.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.00%
Negative EPS growth while EXFY is at 50.39%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXFY is at 50.39%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.94%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 1.72%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 1.72%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.06%
OCF growth under 50% of EXFY's 5077.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
176.67%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 120.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
2.99%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
2.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
112.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with EXFY's 122.11%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
112.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to EXFY's 122.11%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
112.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
21.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
21.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
21.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-1.99%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while EXFY stands at 1343.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-1.99%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while EXFY is at 1343.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-1.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while EXFY is at 88.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.52%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-20.13%
Inventory is declining while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.14%
Negative asset growth while EXFY invests at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.56%
We have a declining book value while EXFY shows 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-14.27%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.55%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
15.51%
We expand SG&A while EXFY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.