PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.31%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.29%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 0.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
8.01%
EBIT growth below 50% of EXFY's 112.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.01%
Operating income growth under 50% of EXFY's 112.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.62%
Net income growth under 50% of EXFY's 26.90%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.38%
EPS growth at 50-75% of EXFY's 28.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
15.38%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of EXFY's 28.15%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
1.02%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 1.71%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.02%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 1.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.15%
Negative OCF growth while EXFY is at 181.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.72%
Negative FCF growth while EXFY is at 1351.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
0.52%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
0.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
0.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
107.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 168.29%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
107.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 168.29%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
107.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
11.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
11.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
11.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.54%
AR growth well above EXFY's 6.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-32.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Asset growth at 50-75% of EXFY's 4.38%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
0.47%
Under 50% of EXFY's 5.24%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.49%
We have some new debt while EXFY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.97%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. EXFY's 7.76%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.44%
We expand SG&A while EXFY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.