PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.61%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.34%
Positive gross profit growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-21.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
50.35%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.38%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.38%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.99%
Share reduction more than 1.5x EXFY's 2.15%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x EXFY's 2.15%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.52%
Positive OCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
142.32%
Positive FCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
35.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
35.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
127.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with EXFY's 129.64%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
127.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to EXFY's 129.64%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
127.09%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
37.87%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
37.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
37.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of EXFY's 62.37%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-5.83%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while EXFY stands at 1563.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-5.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while EXFY is at 1563.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-5.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while EXFY is at 39.63%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.06%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
37.20%
Inventory growth of 37.20% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.84%
Asset growth well under 50% of EXFY's 8.96%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.04%
We have a declining book value while EXFY shows 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.62%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
9.02%
SG&A declining or stable vs. EXFY's 22.94%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.