PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.95%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.67%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-93.99%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-80.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-97.47%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-101.01%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-101.01%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.72%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.32%
Negative OCF growth while EXFY is at 85.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-5.81%
Negative FCF growth while EXFY is at 106.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
71.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
71.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
129.82%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
158.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with EXFY's 160.91%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
158.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to EXFY's 160.91%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
196.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
76.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
76.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
72.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXFY's 4.12%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
11.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 11.07% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
11.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 11.07% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
4.69%
Below 50% of EXFY's 24.02%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.65%
Inventory is declining while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.44%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while EXFY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2.27%
We have some new debt while EXFY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.60%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
11.38%
SG&A declining or stable vs. EXFY's 65.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.