PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.87M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.54%
Positive revenue growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.47%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 10.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-9.37%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-9.37%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-6.24%
Negative net income growth while FLNC stands at 66.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-6.25%
Negative EPS growth while FLNC is at 69.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-6.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FLNC is at 69.89%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FLNC stands at 13.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Negative asset growth while FLNC invests at 106.59%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
100.00%
Under 50% of FLNC's 1365.64%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
16.60%
R&D dropping or stable vs. FLNC's 74.19%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
10.50%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FLNC's 113.35%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.